Research Publication Rating and Indexing
Add Index Article Form
Home
Add Index Article
Journal Id
*
Journal Title
*
Name of Article
*
Year of publication
*
DOI Number
*
First Author Name
*
First Author Affiliation
*
Second Author Name
Second Author Affiliation
Third Author Name
Third Author Affiliation
Fourth Author Name
Fourth Author Affiliation
Fifth Author Name
Fifth Author Affiliation
Sixth Author Name
Sixth Author Affiliation
Seventh Author Name
Seventh Author Affiliation
Article Abstract
Recent scandals have damaged India's business image among international investors, despite the independent director's role in promoting corporate governance. Satyam and Enron instances have stressed the necessity for independent directors. Clause 49 of the SEBI listing agreement, Birla report, CII suggestion, Narayan Murthy Committee, and J.J. Irani Committee reports didn't help. Tata and other examples illustrate that the independent director is operating in a promoter's line and has failed to prevent undue enrichment by management and promoters. This article found a disconnect between IDs' actual function and their intended purpose. Independent directors should vote and participate in corporate matters impartially since they have no stake in the firm. The Independent director may be removed by a majority shareholder vote. Independent directors may oppose one-sided initiatives to defend minority shareholders' interests. In Corporate Governance, Independent Directors are crucial to defending minority shareholders' interests.
Article Keywords
*
Article Link
*