BOARD OF ADVISORY

The Research Publication Rating and Indexing (RPRI) Services is an international quality assurance agency, working to improve and establish research journal and academic book publication standards all over the world. It is an international board of experts from various disciplines monitored and operated by Research Publication Rating and Indexing Services, Manatri, India.
The Assessment and Rating Board of Research Publication Rating and Indexing (RPRI) Service comprises active researchers and experts selected from a pool of scholars who have made significant and well-recognized contributions to the field. The board comprises many highly educated, qualified, suitable subject matter experts belonging to various disciplines. The overall duties of board members include but are not limited to, collecting the publication-related information from the various sources, assessing publication quality as per the decided assessment sheet, suggesting the scope of improvement to the publisher, etc.
The board involved all the members as per their demands and information submission, and all the members agreed to work voluntarily. RPRI's success lies essentially in its professional and experienced Assessment and Rating Board Members, who are responsible for the assessment and rating of research journal publications as per the defined assessment and rating standards. Coming from varied backgrounds, assessment and rating board members are leaders and renowned figures of the academic fraternity. As Assessment and Rating Board Members of RPRI, they enjoy the privileges and benefits associated with the title and get the opportunity to interact with a diverse community of research publication access and professionals in their respective regions around the world.

Roles and Responsibilities of the Board

1. Contribute specialized knowledge and expertise in the relevant field or discipline by providing objective assessment of journals based on scholarly merit.
2. Review and assess journals according to predetermined criteria and standards by evaluating the quality, relevance, and impact of journal content, including articles, editorial processes, and overall publication practices.
3. Ensure that the assessment process maintains high standards of objectivity and fairness by identifying and addressing any potential conflicts of interest or biases that may influence the assessment.
4. Understand and adhere to the established guidelines, criteria, and standards for journal assessment by applying these standards consistently and fairly to all journals under review.
5. Complete assessments within established timelines to support timely decision-making by prioritizing and managing workload to contribute to the efficiency of the assessment process.
6. Provide clear and constructive feedback regarding journals under review by communicating assessment results and recommendations effectively.
7. Stay informed about current trends, developments, and best practices in research publication assessment and rating by continuously updating knowledge and skills to contribute to the improvement of the assessment process.
8. Maintain confidentiality regarding the details of journal assessments by handling sensitive information with care and ensuring that assessment details are not disclosed inappropriately.
9. Collaborate with other board members and stakeholders involved in the assessment process by contributing to discussions, sharing insights, and working collectively to make informed decisions.
10. Provide feedback to the board chair or organization overseeing the assessment process by sharing insights and recommendations for improving the assessment framework, criteria, and overall process.